On changing lines. There are two cases of changing lines that don't make any sense to me.
1. Baseball bets that don't fix the starting pitcher
It seems that a lot of books take a baseball bet where you take team vs. team without specifying the starting pitcher. However, if the starting pitcher changes then the book has the right to change the line after you bet it so your bet of $100 at +145 could become $100 at -90. Why does it work like this? It seems unfair. Are they worried about people with inside information (like the non-public health of a pitcher) profiting?
2. "Obvious" bad lines
A bunch of onlines books seem to reserve the right to change "obvious" bad lines and don't explain what obvious means. I don't understand why they should have that right, especially when their "obvious" bad lines are only slightly bad or are stale. Shouldn't that be their responsibility to keep their lines sane, and adjust them quickly if they notice they are out of whack or getting 1-sided action. It seems to me that if there is a line that is up I should be able to play it. At least if it is within a couple orders of magnitude of correct. Otherwise how do I know if I've done good line shopping only to get my line changed to a line I wouldn't bet on.
Anyone able to explain these questions for me?
1. Baseball bets that don't fix the starting pitcher
It seems that a lot of books take a baseball bet where you take team vs. team without specifying the starting pitcher. However, if the starting pitcher changes then the book has the right to change the line after you bet it so your bet of $100 at +145 could become $100 at -90. Why does it work like this? It seems unfair. Are they worried about people with inside information (like the non-public health of a pitcher) profiting?
2. "Obvious" bad lines
A bunch of onlines books seem to reserve the right to change "obvious" bad lines and don't explain what obvious means. I don't understand why they should have that right, especially when their "obvious" bad lines are only slightly bad or are stale. Shouldn't that be their responsibility to keep their lines sane, and adjust them quickly if they notice they are out of whack or getting 1-sided action. It seems to me that if there is a line that is up I should be able to play it. At least if it is within a couple orders of magnitude of correct. Otherwise how do I know if I've done good line shopping only to get my line changed to a line I wouldn't bet on.
Anyone able to explain these questions for me?